Gaps flagged

When evidence is missing it is said, instead of an answer that sounds certain but is not.

How you work it in Colleag

Ask the question; the colleague answers only as far as the material reaches.

The gap is described: what is missing and what it would take.

Decide: test, measure or answer with a reservation.

When the material arrives the answer is updated and archived.

A worked example

“Does the product withstand salt mist per the customer's requirement?”

If the test was never done: the plain statement that evidence is missing, which test it would take and what adjacent documentation actually shows. You choose between testing and answering with a reservation.

Screenshot from Colleag showing the question and the colleague's sourced answer

Screenshot from Colleag. The example uses invented figures.

The material

The test reports that exist
The requirement spec
The standard the customer's requirement points at

You approve

Everything the colleague produces is a proposal with sources. Nothing is published, sent or saved to the archive without a human approving it, and every figure traces to its material.

Curious what it feels like?

We run pilot programs with a few manufacturing companies at a time. Tell us about your business and we will show what the colleagues can do with your documents and your data.