The audit should confirm what you can already show, not force you to invent it.
ISO audits and customer audits ask the same kind of question: why does the product look like this, who approved, where is the proof. If the answer lives in email, the week before is a hunt. Colleag.ai keeps traceability and QMS records current so gaps show before someone else finds them. You will recognise the evening with binders on the conference table.
Continuous traceability
QMS documentation always current
Gap detection
Evidence packages
An 8D that is already filed
Key benefits
- Continuous traceability, not retroactive assembly
- QMS documentation always reflects actual state
- Proactive gap detection before audits
- One-click evidence packages for any product
- Less preparation time, better audit outcomes
Read more
The audit is in three weeks. How do you produce traceability, SOPs and an 8D without a documentation sprint? Colleag.ai has kept the chain continuously, and an 8D can be created in chat and filed in the QMS against the article. ERP is not evidence. PLM is scattered files. The project tool turns audit into a project.
The audit is in three weeks. Traceability, SOPs and an 8D should appear without a documentation sprint. Colleag.ai has kept the chain current. An 8D can be created in chat and filed in QMS against the article, the same part sits in several products.
ERP is not evidence. PLM is scattered files. The project tool turns the audit into a project. The auditor wants the chain, not a timesheet.
How this differs from ERP, PLM, LCM and project systems
- ERP
- The auditor does not want an order screen.
- PLM
- Evidence in PLM is scattered and often the wrong revision.
- LCM
- Released is not an answer to “show the chain”.
- Project management systems
- The audit project is a symptom that traceability was missing.
What Colleag.ai does here that those systems do not
- Continuous traceability, not a retroactive pack
- An 8D from chat, filed in the QMS
- Gaps before the auditor finds them