Compliance should show in ordinary weeks, not only the week before the auditor.
The certificate exists. The question is whether the product you build today is still the product the certificate covers. A part was swapped. A requirement changed. The binder did not follow. Colleag.ai keeps obligations and evidence visible against the product file. You will recognise the scramble for signatures when the customer wants proof tomorrow.
The certificate applies to the product you build today
The duty against the article, not a generic list
The audit should confirm, not discover
Key benefits
- Continuous compliance monitoring rather than periodic reviews
- Automatic flagging when design changes affect certifications
- Requirement-to-standard mapping for ISO, IEC, and industry standards
- Audit-ready documentation maintained continuously
- Clear visibility into compliance status across products and markets
Read more
How do you keep regulatory obligations current across a portfolio, not as a project before an audit? Colleag.ai traces commitments against product files and SOPs. ERP has no clause. PLM has the certificate file. LCM does not have the requirement text. This is the capability; the scene “a new requirement arrived” is another page.
Regulatory duties are continuous, not a project before the audit. Colleag.ai tracks commitments against product files and SOPs across the portfolio, so you see what is missing before anyone books the auditor.
ERP has no clause. PLM has last year’s certificate file. LCM does not have the requirement text. This page is the capability. The scene when a new requirement arrives is a different page.
How this differs from ERP, PLM, LCM and project systems
- ERP
- ERP invoices. It does not read ISO 13485 against your BOM.
- PLM
- PLM stores the certificate. It does not flag which products lose coverage.
- LCM
- LCM can require recertification as a status. It does not write the gap list.
- Project management systems
- Compliance as a programme is time. Continuous control is Colleag.ai.
What Colleag.ai does here that those systems do not
- Obligations against the product, not in a separate register
- Gaps when the standard changes, not at audit
- The same traceability the auditor will ask for