The standard should show in the chain, not only on the reception wall.
Colleag.ai is not your management system. It keeps the chain of requirement, decision, test and register so you can point when the auditor asks. ERP invoices. PLM can store the certificate. The trail lives here. You will recognise the clause someone pasted into a spec without knowing whether the product actually meets it.
Standards supported
Compliance as part of daily engineering work
Documentation that satisfies auditors
Staying current with standard revisions
Key benefits
- Compliance monitoring for ISO 9001, ISO 13485, IEC 61508, and more
- Automatic gap detection when design changes affect compliance
- Traceability documentation maintained continuously
- Audit-ready documentation without last-minute preparation
- Standard revision tracking and impact assessment
- Reduced cost and disruption of compliance maintenance
Read more
How does Colleag.ai help with ISO 9001, ISO 13485 or IEC 61508 without being your QMS system? By keeping traceability, SOPs and records current and citable. ERP invoices. PLM stores the certificate. LCM changes status. The audit asks for the chain, it lives here.
Colleag.ai is not your QMS. It keeps traceability, SOPs and registers current and citable so ISO 9001, ISO 13485 or IEC 61508 is not a binder the week before the audit.
ERP invoices. PLM stores the certificate. LCM changes status. The auditor asks for the chain from requirement to evidence. That chain sits in the files you actually work in.
How this differs from ERP, PLM, LCM and project systems
- ERP
- ERP is not the evidence the auditor wants.
- PLM
- PLM has the file. It does not have the gap against the clause.
- LCM
- LCM says released. It does not show requirement-to-test.
- Project management systems
- Audit as a Jira project is preparation panic.
What Colleag.ai does here that those systems do not
- Purchased standards as context, not a PDF on disk
- Gaps against your own portfolio
- The same material as an 8D and an SOP